NBC did not find these words important enough to include in the aired interview!!
“And I didn't go around seeking out every young person for sexual needs
that I've helped. There are many that I didn't have -- I hardly had any
contact with who I have helped in many, many ways," he added.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/18/prosecutors-request-transcripts-from-sandusky-interview-disturbing-unaired/#ixzz1yHjfsIE7
It
is hard to imagine what possessed a news reporting organization to
selectively provide portions of the tape of this interview for public
viewing. Clearly, they withheld the most compelling part of the
interview. To say that they
violated the trust society places in them as an objective reporter of
the news is the understatement of a lifetime.
One can only wonder what their objective in this action was:
Was it to support Jerry Sandusky by hiding segments that could have a negative impact on his defense?
Was it to show that they do not find the charges against Sandusky credible and choose to intervene in the process by editing content in his favor, rather than allowing full disclosure and justice to take the proper course?
Does NBC actually condone the behavior in the accusations being faced by Sandusky, and this is their way of expressing that support?
Where is Bob Costas
in this process? Where is his outrage that his employer would so
inappropriately distort the content of his interview by omission and, as a result, put
at risk the proper justice that a jury of peers will decide?
IF Jerry Sandusky is guilty of the charges, he is raping these young me again in the public arena. For NBC to facilitate that process is truly despicable.
If
you ever watch NBC again, think with each story, "How have they
distorted the content for some ulterior motive?" “Wonder what is
missing?” Can I trust them to be reporters of the news and not molders
of their own message?
No comments:
Post a Comment